Academisation of Hip Hop

The academisation of hip-hop can be a fruitful venture as many universities across the globe are continually working to see this through. The scholars and researchers behind the academisation of hip-hop know that they have an enormous task of maneuvering between the street aspects of hip-hop “realness” as well as the academic expectations of the same.  Although some of the initial core elements of hip hop include deejaying, dancing, raping and graffiti among others, the academisation has brought a new light into the forgotten world. Institutions like Harvard have started embracing hip hop to reach out to new categories of students as well as to broaden areas of sociological and music research. In this hip hop culture essay the academisation of hip-hop has equally touched on racial authenticity and issues about the nationalism of the African Americans.

From the theoretical framework of the study, various scholars argue out that through the academisation of hip-hop, the African Americans as well as the brown population will get a chance to define and identify their cultural affiliation as opposed to the white’s perspective. Through the qualitative approach of interviews and the disclosure analysis, information was gathered from various respondents. The methodology focuses on how the academisation of hip-hop is an ice-breaker, a setup, a label of low cultural affiliation as well as an enlightening tool.

The academisation of hip-hop has branded the area of study with an attractive title which will, in turn, open a leeway for possibilities and hence attract more scholars and researchers into the filed. The attractive label can draw more scholars who will, in turn, delve into other fields in the process of research and hence create a sense of diversity. Various scholars argue that hip-hop should be pinned to a sociological field of study to create authenticity. Hip-hop, therefore, acts as educational bait as well as an attractive label that future music educators, scholars, and researchers will use as a double feature within university legislation.

The advantages of academisation of hip hop

Various researchers and scholars have presented strong reasons based on scientific research on the importance and relevance of the academisation of hip-hop. From the institution’s economic fronts, academisation means more students and hence credibility to the concerned faculties. Researchers conclude that it is due to the many tenets of hip-hop that open a leeway for diversification in the academic domain. The academisation of hip-hop will also bring about its political ideologies into discussion which will in turn bring about a form of legitimacy in discussion in the music education field. However, there is bias in the aspect and concept of duality of hip-hop as one of the core arguments of the research asserted. Various scholars still find it difficult to brand hip hop as a part of the arts under music or sociology. The reason is that for on to be considered as both an academician and a street ambassador of hip-hop, one ought to have a form of affiliation with the hip-hop culture. It is untrue to state that the academisation of hip-hop is a trap and an academic de-valuation. The academisation of hip-hop instead opens a range of possibilities in both musicology and sociology.


Disadvantages of academisation of hip hop

The dual attitude towards hip-hop in many institutions has resulted in a counter effect on the education policy. Since through the academisation of hip-hop many organizations seek to enlist and increase the number of students among other things, it hurt the development of research in this field. Hip-hop suddenly becomes devalued and loses its initial authenticity and conservative nature. The scholars and researchers in the field of hip-hop are seen as an illegitimate and second class as opposed to those of other genres and areas of research. Through critiquing hip-hop, there is inconsistency and bias as some researchers seem to critique the bigwigs to gain recognition as opposed to promoting the ideal values and intentions of the study. Various scholars equally use inappropriate language which makes research and the approach towards rationalization awkward and lopsided. The non-academic approach to the academisation of hip-hop by various scholars and research sources make the concept seem illegitimate through preconception, inconsistent and inaccurate data.

Conclusion and recommendation

The academisation of hip-hop epitomizes an academic habitus although the access and affiliation to the sub-cultural or street connection are an added advantage. The research on hip-hop as a sub-genre of music opens a world of possibilities and untapped exploration in both music and sociology. It is however incorrect and biased to say that the world of academics cannot accommodate hip-hop because it is shallow and does not have universally accepted research approaches. Hip-hop should, therefore, be developed as a sub-genre of music and an aspect of sociology. Universities and opportunistic scholars ought to desist from branding and degrading the potential of hip-hop. It is; however, correct to note that hip-hop presents a double-edged effect in institutions regarding research and authenticity.  It is paramount to used hip-hop as educational bait and as a marking label to criticize it for its inherent value.